2 of 11

10. Calgary Flames

flames
Rob Grabowski-USA TODAY Sports

The Flames started out in Atlanta in 1972 before heading to Calgary in 1980. I know that Atlanta hasn’t been successful with having NHL teams, but when the latest team was in town, it would have been nice if the Flames name was put to good use.

3 of 11

9. Los Angeles Dodgers

dodgers
Benny Sieu-USA TODAY Sports

This is an absolute no-brainer. The team was in Brooklyn from 1932-57 before heading to Los Angeles. I think of Jackie Robinson and Duke Snider when I think of the Dodgers and that was when the team was in Brooklyn. It will never change now, but it is just another team name that never should have left town.

4 of 11

8. Dallas Stars

stars
Jerome Miron-USA TODAY Sports

The franchise started in 1967 in Minnesota as the North Stars before moving to Dallas in 1993. I really wish the name would have stayed in Minnesota, so the new team could have used it. While the name does fit in Dallas, it would have better-served remaining at home in Minnesota.

5 of 11

7. Oakland Athletics

athletics
Matthew Emmons-USA TODAY Sports

If you are looking for a team name that should have been kept in its original city, here it is. The Athletics began in Philadelphia in 1901 and stayed there until 1954 before moving to Kansas City. The team ended up in Oakland in 1968. There is a lot of tradition with the Philadelphia Athletics. I wish it would have been kept.

6 of 11

6. San Francisco Giants

giants
Ed Szczepanski-USA TODAY Sports

This will spark a lot of debate, but the team started in New York in 1884 as the New York Gothams before being the New York Giants. The move came in 1958 out west. I’m sorry but the name Giants should have stayed in the city of New York instead of going west with the team.

7 of 11

5. Memphis Grizzlies

grizzlies
Soobum Im-USA TODAY Sports

The Grizzlies were an expansion team in 1995 that began in Vancouver with a very appropriate name. When I think of the northwest, I think of grizzlies. I don’t think anyone really needs to think of grizzlies when their mind goes to Memphis.

8 of 11

4. St. Louis Rams

rams
Jeff Curry-USA TODAY Sports

The franchise started in Cleveland in 1936 and moved to Los Angeles in 1946. The big move came in 1995, when they moved to St. Louis. I think of this team as the Los Angeles Rams, but frankly if St. Louis has a team, they should be known by a different name.

9 of 11

3. Arizona Cardinals

cardinals
Matt Kartozian-USA TODAY Sports

This one is just too obvious. The team began play in 1920 in Chicago before moving to St. Louis in 1960. Their next move was to Arizona in 1988. I’m sorry, but this is a charter member of the NFL. The name should have stayed in Chicago or even better in St. Louis and not in Arizona.

10 of 11

2. Los Angeles Lakers

lakers
Gary A. Vasquez-USA TODAY Sports

The team began in Minneapolis in 1947 and stayed there until 1960, before heading west. Minnesota is the “Land of 10,000 Lakes.” I could be wrong, but I don’t see enough lakes out in Los Angeles for this name to be correct.

11 of 11

1. Utah Jazz

jazz
Jerome Miron-USA TODAY Sports

The franchise began in New Orleans in 1974 and moved to Utah in 1979. I can see New Orleans with the Jazz, but where’s the jazz in Utah? It would have been best for the team in New Orleans to now get this name back, instead of what they went with.


More Clubhouse

15 Biggest Crybabies in Professional Sports
15 Biggest Crybabies in Professional Sports
The 15 Biggest Geeks in Sports
The 15 Biggest Geeks in Sports
fan featured Bob Donnan-USA TODAY Sports
15 Most Annoying Types of Sports Fans
opener sara galimberti instagram
Top 20 Sexiest Women in Sports
Intro1
Tim Tebow and the 10 Athletes You Don’t Want Playing Sports Again
Intro
Military Surprises: Top 10 at Sporting Events
Party Animals
Rob Gronkowski and the Top 10 Athletes Who Love to Party
15 Sports Videos That Prove Running on the Field is a Terrible Idea
15 Sports Videos That Prove Running on the Field is a Terrible Idea

Around the Web

ZergNet

From Our Partners