The Los Angeles Lakers made an interesting move last offseason, signing Jordan Hill to a two-year deal worth about $18 million. He proved to be a very important role player in the past, but it was hard to justify paying him that much. However, they had cap space after striking out on several free-agents, and held a team option that would allow them to move on if they chose to after one year. With the possibility to sign a star this summer, the team made the right decision to decline his option for another year.

When given consistent playing time, Hill proved that he could be a reliable player. He could fill in for either front court position, and gave the team great energy. He was a very good rebounder who could create second chances for his teammates, and was an adequate defender.

However, last season he didn’t get much help, and instead was relied on as one of the top players on the team. While he offers a good skillset and solid athleticism, Hill is not necessarily a go-to player, and plays better when he has quality teammates to work with. He can make open jump shots when called upon, but is not someone who you will create offense every time after receiving the ball.

As a result, there was very little reason to bring him back on such a large cap hit. The only way that it might make sense would be if the team struck out on other free agents and thought that they could flip his expiring contract during the season for a better player. However that would be a risky play, and they would still have to include other assets to make it work.

Instead, the Lakers can now look for other options in their front court, and possibly free up time for their younger players. They can also choose to bring Hill back, but on a more team-friendly deal that better aligns with his true value. Hill definitely can be an important player, but he would better serve as a role player making less money than being one of the top players on the team.