April 22, 2012 | Make Homepage
Login | Sign Up
Get more Traffic

One Rant to “One Week In: Evaluating Freddy Galvis on His Brief...”

  1. Brewster says:

    So you make the points that “Galvis is just 22 years old and he’s clearly overmatched at the plate … It took Galvis some time to collect his first major league hit … I don’t think many people would have expected Galvis to be hitting as well as he is”

    And using all those points you then downplay his early HR and RBI totals. BUT, you’re basing your “overmatched at the plate” statement on 28 lifetime plate appearances! WOW! Were you to “evaluate” some of the other Phils based on what they have done so far this season there would be more than a handful of guys that have been “clearly overmatched.” But he is 22 and a rookie so you feel safe in dismissing his HR and RBI totals but project your “overmatched” scouting report based on 28 lifetime PA?

    Let’s just say your “evidence and analysis” is less than convincing.

Leave a Rant

Agree? Disagree? Have a different opinion? Let us know what you think...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!