If the game were to be moved outside of warm weather sites, why not give Cincinnati a shot? It is newer and has enough seats to fit everyone that the league would want there. It would be something different for sure.
Here is a Midwestern stadium that would be perfect for the game. It can seat over 76,000 people and would be a welcoming place that just saw a baseball All-Star Game last year.
I like the idea of a Super Bowl being played in Pittsburgh. There is just something to that idea. You can bring back a lot of memories of victories for their hometown team in the process and have a great game as well.
Some of the biggest playoff games in recent years have been in this stadium. If they can play a Super Bowl just down the road in New York, why not have it in New England?
There is a lot of tradition of football there in Cleveland and the economy there could use a boost just like everywhere else. It would at least bring a Super Bowl to town.
A newer stadium in Denver that should have got a Super Bowl as soon as it opened because of promises made to them. This one could be affected by weather too but why not give it a shot?
Seattle may be known for rainy conditions a lot of the time but the noise in that building makes me want a Super Bowl there. The advertisers may not want a rainy Super Bowl but we have seen it before.
The chances of some lake-effect snow always will come into play in Buffalo. However, for a city that saw their team go to four straight Super Bowls in the 1990s, I think they would support having the big game.
The tourism in Chicago would support this working even if there was a blizzard in town. It may be hard to pull off because the date of the next Super Bowl. February 2 is also the same date as the city’s 21-inch snowstorm from 2011.
This one is almost too obvious. How can the greatest game in the sport not be played in this iconic stadium at least once? Who knows if you head up with another Ice Bowl in the process?
